Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

East Carolina

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for East Carolina, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
RJ Felton85.1%-0.0range -0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+4.3range +3.6 to +5.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Riley84.9%+0.4range -0.3 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+4.5range +4.0 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
C.J. Walker78.2%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.4 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cam Hayes75.0%-0.1range -1.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.1 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jayshayne Woodard53.6%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Trevion LaBeaux48.7%+0.4range -0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Yann Farell43.1%+0.5range -0.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cyr Malonga9.9%-0.1range -0.8 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Reid Cason7.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Julien Soumaoro6.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Tybo Bailey4.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Bencao Vungo2.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Callum Richard0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Grant Smith0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$4,299,003Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$4,288,223Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
3 or more days27

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology