Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

E Washington

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for E Washington, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Andrew Cook69.8%+0.3range -0.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sebastian Hartmann69.7%+0.4range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mason Williams65.6%-2.5range -3.7 to -1.5Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.3 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nic McClain65.5%-2.1range -3.2 to -1.0Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.4 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emmett Marquardt57.6%+1.7range +0.3 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.4 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Vice Zanki41.6%-1.2range -2.9 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tyler Powell39.8%+0.2range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sam Stockton31.3%+0.4range -1.4 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Thomas25.9%-0.7range -1.5 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Angelo Winkel15.8%-0.8range -1.7 to -0.0Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Pavlo Dziuba9.0%-3.5range -4.3 to -2.6Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Seale6.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Shaumba Ngoyi2.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (83%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,233,492Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,233,492Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days11
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology