Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

E Illinois

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for E Illinois, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Kooper Jacobi85.3%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.4 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nakyel Shelton80.4%+0.2range -0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.6 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zion Fruster66.4%-2.6range -4.0 to -1.3Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Artese Stapleton59.8%-0.4range -1.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rodolfo Rufino Bolis49.9%-1.6range -2.3 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Malik Olafioye37.1%-3.9range -5.1 to -2.6Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.4 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Obadiah Curtis36.6%-0.4range -1.5 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Corey Sawyer Jr27.6%+0.5range -0.6 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sekou Kalle14.5%-1.5range -2.6 to -0.3Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lazar Grbovic12.2%-2.1range -2.9 to -1.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Carson Prost10.1%-0.8range -1.3 to -0.1Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Terry McMorris7.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Blake Goodman6.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Isaiah Griffin2.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Connor2.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Kam O'Connor0.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 28 games passed lineup acceptance (89%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 28 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,591,175Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,591,175Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days9
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games5

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology