Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Delaware St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Delaware St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Kaseem Watson85.1%-0.2range -1.2 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Robert Smith82.7%+0.2range -0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Martaz Robinson78.2%-0.0range -1.1 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Muneer Newton66.9%+0.5range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Alston Andrews60.1%-0.3range -1.2 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Corey Perkins34.8%-2.0range -2.9 to -1.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Raymond Somerville27.1%-1.7range -2.8 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ponce James26.4%+0.1range -0.8 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Surgers15.4%-2.1range -3.0 to -1.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Javarzia Belton9.2%-1.1range -1.6 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kareem Watson7.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Dean Shepherd5.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
John Clemmons0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Theodore Pendergrass III0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

22 of 26 games passed lineup acceptance (85%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 26 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,162,648Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,162,648Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days6
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.0
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games6

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology