Cornell
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Noard | 71.9% | +1.9range +0.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | +4.2range +3.5 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Nazir Williams | 70.7% | +2.4range +1.3 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| AK Okereke | 66.3% | +2.9range +1.7 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.7 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jake Fiegen | 65.9% | +1.7range +0.5 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Guy Ragland Jr. | 60.4% | +3.0range +2.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | +3.9range +3.5 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jacob Beccles | 41.5% | +0.2range -0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ryan Kiachian | 29.1% | +0.0range -0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| DJ Nix | 27.6% | -0.9range -1.9 to +0.3Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Adam Hinton | 26.3% | -0.0range -1.0 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Anthony Nimani | 14.2% | +0.8range -0.0 to +1.7Limited evidence | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Chris Cain | 10.1% | +0.6range +0.0 to +1.1Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Gioacchino Panzini | 6.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Corbin Zentner | 3.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Josh Baldwin | 3.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| AJ Rodriguez | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Mateen Rafiq | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| AJ LaBeau | 0.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ian Imegwu | 0.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
24 of 27 games passed lineup acceptance (89%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 3 of 27 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,608,946 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,523,103 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 4 |
| 2 days | 4 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.1 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 5 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology