Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Chicago St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Chicago St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Matthew Robinson73.1%-2.6range -3.7 to -1.4Sufficient evidence+1.2range +0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jalen Forrest73.0%-1.8range -3.0 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Gabe Spinelli70.6%-3.6range -4.9 to -2.3Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Noble Crawford59.6%-1.3range -2.6 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Saxby Sunderland49.3%-2.3range -3.4 to -1.2Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Troy McKoy, Jr.38.4%-1.7range -2.8 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Quincy Allen32.5%-1.4range -2.6 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dailliss Cox31.3%-0.8range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
CJ Delancy28.5%-1.9range -2.8 to -1.1Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cameron Jernigan24.0%-1.8range -2.6 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Greg Spate8.0%-1.8range -2.3 to -1.1Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.2Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael Brown4.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Joe Spinelli4.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Alex Raiford2.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,355,956Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,355,956Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days9
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games9

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology