Charleston So
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taje' Kelly | 91.5% | -2.5range -3.4 to -1.6Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Daylen Berry | 89.2% | -1.3range -2.1 to -0.4Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Lamar Oden Jr. | 79.0% | -0.8range -1.5 to -0.0Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| RJ Johnson | 77.9% | -0.7range -1.9 to +0.4Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.1 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Reis Jones | 52.5% | -0.6range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +1.8range +1.5 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Keenan Wilkins | 27.6% | -3.6range -4.5 to -2.4Sufficient evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Lase Olalere | 23.7% | -2.3range -3.1 to -1.7Sufficient evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Thompson Camara | 22.9% | -0.1range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Anthony Gause | 12.7% | -1.7range -2.2 to -1.2Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaylon Gibson | 10.4% | -0.4range -1.0 to +0.2Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| DJ Patrick | 8.9% | +0.5range -0.2 to +1.4Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Derrick Harris Jr. | 3.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 3 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,688,815 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,688,815 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 27 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology