Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Campbell

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Campbell, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Nolan Dorsey82.4%+1.8range +0.5 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+5.0range +4.2 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cam Gregory76.5%-1.5range -2.6 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colby Duggan71.3%+0.4range -0.6 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.2 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jasin Sinani60.2%+2.6range +1.1 to +4.1Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.3 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Zurliene52.7%+2.0range +0.6 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tasos Cook46.8%-1.4range -2.7 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Eric Van Der Heijden34.6%+1.4range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Terren Frank25.2%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Walsh22.7%-0.1range -1.0 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.1range +1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bragi Gudmundsson12.0%-1.7range -2.7 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Israel Yaw5.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Gediminas Mokseckas4.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Omar Harris4.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Wesley Johnson0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Broc Bidwell0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (83%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$2,126,965Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,126,966Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days8
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology