Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

California

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for California, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Andrej Stojakovic83.7%+1.5range +0.6 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.9 to +5.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rytis Petraitis73.9%+0.9range +0.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.3 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jeremiah Wilkinson66.0%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.6Limited evidence+3.6range +3.0 to +4.1Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Joshua Ola-Joseph63.7%+0.8range -0.6 to +2.1Limited evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mady Sissoko63.3%+0.2range -0.6 to +0.9Limited evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Christian Tucker46.0%-1.9range -2.5 to -1.5Limited evidence+1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jovan Blacksher Jr.41.7%+1.0range +0.8 to +1.3Limited evidence+2.2range +2.0 to +2.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lee Dort31.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Spencer Mahoney22.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Devin Curtis5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jack McCloskey1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jayden Karapetian0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Matt Desler0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

6 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (18%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 27 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$13,249,051Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$14,101,936Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched by a manual override chosen by the model author. Its checks (IPEDS identity, state, home-venue city) confirm only that the pick is self-consistent. They are not independent proof that this school is the same program. If the match were wrong, these figures would belong to a different school.manual EADA match, not independently verified

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
3 or more days31

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology