Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Cal Poly

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Cal Poly, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Owen Koonce75.2%+0.0range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jarred Hyder74.3%-0.9range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Jessup71.8%+3.5range +2.1 to +4.5Sufficient evidence+5.1range +4.4 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mac Riniker60.9%+1.4range +0.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+3.6range +2.9 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Peter Bandelj60.1%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Guzman Vasilic37.0%-0.8range -1.8 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cayden Ward30.0%-1.8range -2.6 to -0.7Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Luka Tarlac27.7%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aaron Price, Jr.21.8%-1.8range -2.8 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ethan Menzies17.1%-0.6range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kieran Elliott11.3%-0.6range -1.1 to -0.1Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Paul Bizimana4.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Hayden Jory4.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Logan McLaughlin2.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Spears1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Eric Brown0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 34 games passed lineup acceptance (76%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 8 of 34 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,537,259Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,537,259Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched through an NCES IPEDS institution alias, with state and home-venue city agreeing.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days10
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent4
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology