Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

C Michigan

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for C Michigan, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jakobi Heady91.4%+1.6range +0.4 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.6 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anthony Pritchard91.2%+0.1range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.5range +2.9 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cayden Vasko81.4%-0.4range -1.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kyler VanderJagt68.1%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.9 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ugnius Jarusevicius64.5%+1.9range +0.7 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.7 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryan Ndjonga48.0%-1.0range -1.9 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Damarion Bonds26.6%-0.3range -1.5 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Quentin Heady14.6%-0.4range -1.2 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Hunter Harding6.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Shaedon Simpson6.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
DeCorion Temple0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Drew Barbee0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Mohammad Habhab0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

22 of 27 games passed lineup acceptance (81%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 27 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,549,633Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,549,633Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days1
3 or more days25

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology