Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Boston Univ

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Boston Univ, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Kyrone Alexander72.8%+0.3range -0.8 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.3 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael McNair70.4%-0.8range -1.7 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Miles Brewster64.8%-0.3range -1.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Malcolm Chimezie53.0%-0.3range -1.1 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nico Nobili49.9%-0.9range -2.2 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Roy48.8%+0.0range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Azmar Abdullah43.9%-0.4range -1.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Defty27.8%+0.3range -0.6 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Otto Landrum25.5%-0.6range -1.6 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Palacios22.9%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Matai Baptiste14.4%-0.6range -1.4 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.9Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ethan Okwuosa2.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Spencer Joyner1.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Quinn Nielsen0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Ryan Sutliff0.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$3,210,362Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$3,210,362Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched by a manual override chosen by the model author. Its checks (IPEDS identity, state, home-venue city) confirm only that the pick is self-consistent. They are not independent proof that this school is the same program. If the match were wrong, these figures would belong to a different school.manual EADA match, not independently verified

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology