Binghamton
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tymu Chenery | 91.8% | +0.1range -0.8 to +0.7Sufficient evidence | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Gavin Walsh | 82.3% | +0.1range -0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Chris Walker | 80.1% | -0.7range -1.9 to +0.3Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Wes Peterson | 61.2% | +0.1range -1.0 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Nehemiah Benson | 60.0% | -1.5range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ben Callahan-Gold | 50.2% | +0.9range -0.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Evan Ashe | 47.4% | -3.6range -4.7 to -2.4Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.7 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jayden Lemond | 15.5% | -2.9range -3.7 to -2.0Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackson Benigni | 7.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Max Sims | 2.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Stephan Snagg | 1.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dominic Capriotti | 0.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Robby Phillips | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
22 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (76%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 7 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,437,431 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,437,431 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 2 days | 7 |
| 3 or more days | 19 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 3 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology