Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Bethune-Cookman

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Bethune-Cookman, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Trey Thomas80.7%-1.8range -2.7 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jesus Carralero Martin73.4%+0.3range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.4range +3.0 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daniel Rouzan68.1%-1.1range -2.0 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Seneca Willoughby63.0%+0.7range -0.3 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.7 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kalil Camara62.6%-0.0range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.4 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Reggie Ward Jr.44.7%-1.0range -2.2 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brayon Freeman38.3%-1.7range -2.9 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Onanina33.6%-0.8range -1.5 to -0.0Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Gianni Hunt17.2%-1.0range -2.1 to +0.0Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jarrell Love10.7%-3.9range -4.8 to -3.1Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jerome Beya5.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Trayvon Barbary1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Antwann Jones0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Simeon Womack0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (70%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 10 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,970,796Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,970,796Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days9
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games9

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology