Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Austin Peay

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Austin Peay, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
LJ Thomas67.4%-1.0range -1.9 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Quan Lax64.7%-1.3range -2.4 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anton Brookshire64.6%-0.3range -1.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tate McCubbin63.5%+1.0range +0.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.6 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Haney56.5%-1.6range -2.8 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tekao Carpenter44.3%-0.7range -1.9 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sai Witt42.5%+0.6range -0.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.7 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Hansel Enmanuel23.3%-0.9range -1.6 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
JaVar Daniel15.8%+2.4range +1.3 to +3.2Limited evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.0Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Akili Evans14.4%-1.1range -1.9 to -0.1Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daniel Loos14.1%-2.6range -3.3 to -1.7Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Darius Dawson11.6%-0.0range -0.8 to +0.8Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Me'Kell Burries8.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Terrell Gaines7.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Bowen Hammer1.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (74%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 8 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,590,785Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,590,785Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched by a manual override chosen by the model author. Its checks (IPEDS identity, state, home-venue city) confirm only that the pick is self-consistent. They are not independent proof that this school is the same program. If the match were wrong, these figures would belong to a different school.manual EADA match, not independently verified

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days8
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology