Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

American Univ

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for American Univ, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Matt Rogers67.2%+0.6range -0.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.6 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Greg Jones66.4%+0.6range -0.8 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.2 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colin Smalls65.2%-1.4range -2.8 to -0.0Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Stephens64.6%-0.8range -2.1 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.5 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lincoln Ball62.9%+0.5range -1.0 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.7range +2.9 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Matt Mayock59.7%+0.9range -0.4 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.1 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Geoff Sprouse36.0%-3.5range -4.5 to -2.3Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.7 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Wyatt Nausadis30.7%-0.0range -1.3 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Eric Michaels20.2%-0.5range -1.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Julen Iturbe11.5%-1.2range -2.2 to -0.2Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mason Whittaker9.0%-1.2range -1.7 to -0.6Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Adrian Samuels5.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Noah Jones0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Alex Daniels0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Adam Holod0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (91%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,085,642Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,085,642Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days4
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology