Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Penn

2024 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Penn, 2024: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Tyler Perkins76.6%-0.2range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.0 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nick Spinoso72.7%+1.4range +0.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
George Smith64.3%-0.2range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Clark Slajchert64.3%+0.8range -0.5 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sam Brown62.9%-0.5range -1.5 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andrew Laczkowski37.9%+0.6range -0.4 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ed Holland III26.5%-0.2range -1.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cam Thrower26.0%-0.4range -1.3 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Reese McMullen22.5%-0.5range -1.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.5 to +0.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Augustus Gerhart16.8%-0.2range -1.2 to +1.0Limited evidence+0.6range +0.4 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Johnnie Walter14.7%-1.6range -2.7 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Niklas Polonowski12.9%+0.5range -0.5 to +1.5Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colin Chambers0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chris Ubochi0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jake Hsu0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

22 of 27 games passed lineup acceptance (81%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 27 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day6
2 days2
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology