Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Michigan

2024 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Michigan, 2024: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Terrance Williams II78.6%-0.3range -1.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nimari Burnett76.9%+0.3range -1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dug McDaniel69.3%+2.8range +1.4 to +4.1Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tarris Reed Jr.66.7%-1.5range -2.8 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Olivier Nkamhoua63.8%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Will Tschetter44.7%+0.3range -0.6 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tray Jackson32.0%-1.0range -2.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaelin Llewellyn29.7%-1.9range -2.8 to -1.1Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
George Washington III11.9%-1.9range -2.7 to -1.1Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jace Howard11.0%-2.2range -2.7 to -1.4Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Youssef Khayat8.1%-0.9range -1.7 to -0.1Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Selvala2.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Ian Burns2.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Harrison Hochberg1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Cooper Smith1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
3 or more days29

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology