Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Citadel

2024 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Citadel, 2024: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Madison Durr85.3%-0.3range -1.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Quentin Millora-Brown82.4%+2.3range +0.9 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.5 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Morgan82.3%-0.2range -1.0 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
AJ Smith79.0%-0.6range -1.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keynan Davis64.2%-2.7range -3.6 to -1.6Sufficient evidence+1.4range +0.9 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Marcus Pigram25.2%-2.8range -3.7 to -1.7Sufficient evidence+0.5range +0.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Winston Hill24.0%+0.6range -0.5 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kam Roberts15.8%-1.8range -2.6 to -0.8Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colby McAllister14.0%-1.6range -2.5 to -0.9Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Christian Moore8.6%+0.3range +0.0 to +0.6Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josh Davis6.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Levi Birkholz5.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Tony Carpio5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Quinn Nielsen1.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Cole Alexander0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Rowan Irelan0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
3 or more days26

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology