Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Bellarmine

2023 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Bellarmine, 2023: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Juston Betz83.2%+0.4range -0.5 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Garrett Tipton78.2%-3.5range -4.8 to -2.0Sufficient evidence+1.3range +0.7 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Alec Pfriem74.8%-0.6range -2.0 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.5range +1.8 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Peter Suder71.1%-0.7range -1.7 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.4range +1.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Johnson60.1%-2.0range -3.2 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.0 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Curt Hopf56.3%-1.4range -2.4 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Langdon Hatton30.7%+0.8range -0.1 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bash Wieland16.8%-0.0range -0.5 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.6range +0.6 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Landin Hacker15.8%-0.5range -1.3 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sam DeVault6.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jaylen Fairman3.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Michael Bova1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Nick Thelen0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Zac Jennings0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Eli Roberts0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (87%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days9
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games7

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology