Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Merrimack

2023 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Merrimack, 2023: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Ziggy Reid82.3%-0.2range -1.2 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+3.4range +2.7 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Javon Bennett69.8%+0.4range -0.6 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Minor67.8%+2.9range +2.0 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.7 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Derkack60.2%+0.5range -0.7 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan McKoy59.5%-1.8range -2.9 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Devon Savage56.8%+1.4range +0.4 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaylen Stinson45.6%-3.3range -4.5 to -2.1Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.5 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mykel Derring35.5%-1.8range -2.8 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nick Filchner13.1%-1.9range -2.5 to -1.1Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryan Etumnu5.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chevalier Emery2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Elliott Black0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Brandon Legris0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Ryan Isaacson0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Thomas Hall0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

20 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (63%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 12 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days10
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.7
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent4
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology