Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

SMU

2023 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for SMU, 2023: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Zach Nutall78.9%-0.4range -1.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.0 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Samuell Williamson75.0%-0.4range -1.6 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.4range +1.8 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zhuric Phelps73.4%+0.6range -0.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Efe Odigie66.2%-0.7range -1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jalen Smith64.3%-1.8range -3.3 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.0 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Stefan Todorovic41.1%-1.9range -3.1 to -1.0Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keon Ambrose-Hylton34.5%+0.3range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ricardo Wright19.5%-0.7range -1.8 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emory Lanier13.9%-0.9range -1.8 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jefferson Koulibaly10.7%-1.5range -2.5 to -0.6Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mo Njie10.1%-2.9range -4.0 to -2.0Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Franklin Agunanne6.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Darius McBride4.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Xavier Foster1.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Young0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days29

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology