Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Norfolk St

2023 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Norfolk St, 2023: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Joe Bryant80.9%+2.1range +0.7 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.2 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kris Bankston70.6%+1.3range -0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dana Tate66.5%-0.7range -2.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.6 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cahiem Brown64.3%-3.0range -4.0 to -1.9Sufficient evidence+1.2range +0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daryl Anderson44.1%-0.6range -1.8 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Terrance Jones39.4%-0.0range -1.3 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Christian Ings24.3%-0.8range -1.7 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tyrese Jenkins23.4%-0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nyzaiah Chambers22.7%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
George Beale Jr.21.4%+0.6range -0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jack Doumbia Jr.17.1%-0.7range -1.5 to +0.0Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chris Ford15.0%-1.4range -2.2 to -0.6Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andre Bottoms5.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Yoro Sidibe3.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Gilbert Brown1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (79%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 6 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days7
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology