Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Charlotte

2023 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Charlotte, 2023: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Montre Gipson75.4%+2.0range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.5 to +5.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lu'cye Patterson71.3%+0.2range -0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Threadgill71.2%+0.2range -0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.5 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brice Williams66.4%+2.3range +1.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aly Khalifa64.9%+2.5range +1.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.4 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Igor Milicic Jr.49.1%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.8 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaiah Folkes40.6%+0.0range -1.3 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.3 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josh Aldrich25.4%-0.8range -1.7 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.7 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nik Graves14.9%+0.4range -0.6 to +1.3Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Robert Braswell12.1%-0.9range -2.2 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.5range +0.3 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daylen Berry7.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Regin Larson0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Tyler Fearne0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days10
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.7
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology