Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Harlond Beverly

Miami FL · 35 available appearances · 2023–2023

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

416:47 minutes logged

Games logged
35
Minutes per game
11:54
Points per game
3.5
Rebounds / assists per game
1.2 / 1.2
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game3.51.21.20.60.10.80.7
Per 40 minutes11.64.03.91.90.22.82.2
Season totals12142412022923
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG43–9147.3%†2.68.7
2P31–5358.5%†1.55.1
3P12–3831.6%†1.13.6
FT23–2882.1%0.82.7
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
53.8%†58.6%†41.8%†30.8%†1.41

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this season's identity is not linked to a 2025–26 season.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2023 · 2023-04-01ConnecticutL 59–7210:1372110023-51-20-070.0%
2023 · 2023-03-26TexasW 88–817:3401000000-10-00-00.0%
2023 · 2023-03-24HoustonW 89–7512:1901100100-10-10-00.0%
2023 · 2023-03-19IndianaW 85–6912:0931300111-11-10-0150.0%
2023 · 2023-03-17DrakeW 63–5611:2102200000-20-00-00.0%
2023 · 2023-03-10DukeL 78–857:5102000110-20-10-00.0%
2023 · 2023-03-09Wake ForestW 74–7211:5030001121-21-20-075.0%
2023 · 2023-03-04PittsburghW 78–7612:0762000212-30-12-266.7%
2023 · 2023-02-25Florida StL 84–8515:0550100022-51-30-050.0%
2023 · 2023-02-21Virginia TechW 76–7012:0321220111-30-20-033.3%
2023 · 2023-02-18Wake ForestW 96–8712:4030110011-20-11-250.0%
2023 · 2023-02-13North CarolinaW 80–7215:4924100200-20-02-20.0%
2023 · 2023-02-11LouisvilleW 93–8516:1573100001-30-15-833.3%
2023 · 2023-02-06DukeW 81–5918:2193140124-51-20-090.0%
2023 · 2023-01-31Virginia TechW 92–839:4741110112-20-00-0100.0%
2023 · 2023-01-28PittsburghL 68–7112:2521300001-30-00-033.3%
2023 · 2023-01-24Florida StW 86–6316:5142200412-30-00-066.7%
2023 · 2023-01-21DukeL 66–6814:0522100000-20-12-20.0%
2023 · 2023-01-16SyracuseW 82–7822:21163020124-70-18-857.1%
2023 · 2023-01-14NC StateL 81–8319:1133010211-40-21-225.0%
2023 · 2023-01-11Boston CollegeW 88–7220:08150520106-72-21-1100.0%
2023 · 2023-01-04Georgia TechL 70–766:3700200000-10-10-00.0%
2023 · 2022-12-30Notre DameW 76–6511:2821420101-10-00-0100.0%
2023 · 2022-12-20VirginiaW 66–643:5200100000-20-20-00.0%
2023 · 2022-12-10NC StateW 80–7315:5771010113-31-10-0116.7%
2023 · 2022-12-07CornellW 107–1052:0600000000-10-00-00.0%
2023 · 2022-12-04LouisvilleW 80–5311:4032200311-20-11-150.0%
2023 · 2022-11-30RutgersW 68–613:5900001100-00-00-0—
2023 · 2022-11-27UCFW 66–643:2900100110-10-10-00.0%
2023 · 2022-11-23St Francis NYW 79–568:5300000100-00-00-0—
2023 · 2022-11-20MarylandL 70–8816:3440110012-50-20-040.0%
2023 · 2022-11-19ProvidenceW 74–649:2101000100-10-00-00.0%
2023 · 2022-11-15Florida A&MW 87–619:5000320000-30-20-00.0%
2023 · 2022-11-11UNC GreensboroW 79–6517:1893100003-43-40-0112.5%
2023 · 2022-11-07LafayetteW 67–545:1830000111-21-10-075.0%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.