Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Eric Fanning

Boston Univ · 21 available appearances · 2016–2016 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

542:48 minutes logged

Games logged
21
Minutes per game
25:51
Points per game
15.4
Rebounds / assists per game
4.8 / 1.4
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game15.44.81.40.60.52.72.8
Per 40 minutes23.97.42.21.00.74.24.3
Season totals3241003013105759
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG99–18852.7%9.013.9
2P79–13459.0%6.49.9
3P20–5437.0%2.64.0
FT106–13677.9%6.510.0
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.0%65.4%28.7%72.3%0.53

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2016 · 2016-03-21NJITL 72–8318:2383101252-80-24-425.0%
2016 · 2016-03-16FordhamW 69–6634:30219421218-111-14-677.3%
2016 · 2016-03-03American UnivL 64–6930:13186101246-130-36-1246.2%
2016 · 2016-02-21BucknellL 59–8026:0874101432-90-33-322.2%
2016 · 2016-02-17ColgateW 71–6832:33134300444-91-54-550.0%
2016 · 2016-02-13Loyola MDW 73–6534:541415302245-101-13-355.0%
2016 · 2016-02-10American UnivW 71–5132:57253120317-112-39-1072.7%
2016 · 2016-02-03NavyW 83–7223:03154411245-61-14-691.7%
2016 · 2016-01-31LehighW 75–7328:09167211014-101-47-745.0%
2016 · 2016-01-23BucknellL 71–7420:32122100343-40-16-875.0%
2016 · 2016-01-20ColgateL 78–8525:23104000843-90-24-533.3%
2016 · 2016-01-18Loyola MDW 87–8440:55373120449-112-317-2290.9%
2016 · 2016-01-13American UnivW 61–5024:31144310344-101-45-545.0%
2016 · 2016-01-09LafayetteW 68–4731:04227010228-152-54-460.0%
2016 · 2016-01-06NavyL 67–8326:23152100222-51-310-1250.0%
2016 · 2016-01-02LehighL 73–8114:0891110313-62-31-266.7%
2016 · 2015-12-21New HampshireW 78–7426:49183100136-92-44-577.8%
2016 · 2015-12-19CanisiusL 68–8427:13187101136-91-25-872.2%
2016 · 2015-12-10MA LowellW 80–6020:58107110634-101-21-245.0%
2016 · 2015-12-08HarvardL 69–7519:22195010327-100-15-770.0%
2016 · 2015-12-02MassachusettsL 69–994:4030001001-31-10-050.0%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.