Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Brandon Ingram

Duke · 23 available appearances · 2016–2016 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

788:33 minutes logged

Games logged
23
Minutes per game
34:17
Points per game
17.0
Rebounds / assists per game
6.7 / 1.7
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game17.06.71.71.01.42.32.3
Per 40 minutes19.97.92.01.21.72.72.7
Season totals3921553923335354
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG134–30643.8%13.315.5
2P89–18847.3%8.29.5
3P45–11838.1%5.16.0
FT79–11668.1%5.05.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
51.1%54.9%38.6%37.9%0.74

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2016 · 2016-03-24OregonL 68–8239:50245321229-202-74-650.0%
2016 · 2016-03-17UNC WilmingtonW 93–8539:12209312127-121-25-1062.5%
2016 · 2016-03-10Notre DameL 79–8434:40167111545-163-73-440.6%
2016 · 2016-03-05North CarolinaL 72–7628:40108112143-121-53-429.2%
2016 · 2016-02-28PittsburghL 62–7636:28173101345-133-84-450.0%
2016 · 2016-02-20LouisvilleL 64–7139:26852001003-102-50-140.0%
2016 · 2016-02-17North CarolinaW 74–7339:592010412127-212-54-438.1%
2016 · 2016-02-13VirginiaW 63–6238:132571004310-224-91-354.5%
2016 · 2016-02-08LouisvilleW 72–6540:001810401315-92-56-866.7%
2016 · 2016-02-02Georgia TechW 80–7138:481410204203-151-47-823.3%
2016 · 2016-01-25Miami FLL 69–8039:021910210428-131-32-265.4%
2016 · 2016-01-16Notre DameL 91–9528:46254203247-144-77-964.3%
2016 · 2016-01-13ClemsonL 63–6843:29164100246-113-61-268.2%
2016 · 2015-12-30Long Beach StW 103–8134:53145120025-142-72-242.9%
2016 · 2015-12-28ElonW 105–6630:5926111300111-163-61-278.1%
2016 · 2015-12-19UtahL 75–7741:48155033136-162-61-243.8%
2016 · 2015-12-15Ga SouthernW 99–6531:382614212019-132-46-976.9%
2016 · 2015-12-05BuffaloW 82–5938:27238024338-152-45-760.0%
2016 · 2015-11-29Utah StW 85–5228:1686212122-40-04-650.0%
2016 · 2015-11-20VCUW 79–7126:1285201212-70-34-1128.6%
2016 · 2015-11-17KentuckyL 63–7418:0341101441-60-02-216.7%
2016 · 2015-11-14BryantW 113–7523:40213221127-114-63-481.8%
2016 · 2015-11-13SienaW 92–7428:04155122135-161-94-634.4%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.