Jamal Shabazz
Samford · 19 available appearances · 2016–2016 · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
454:55 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 19
- Minutes per game
- 23:57
- Points per game
- 7.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.6 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.7 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 144 | 66 | 5 | 12 | 10 | 23 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 41–111 | 36.9% | 5.8 | 9.8 |
| 2P | 25–49 | 51.0%† | 2.6 | 4.3 |
| 3P | 16–62 | 25.8% | 3.3 | 5.5 |
| FT | 46–53 | 86.8% | 2.8 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.1% | 53.6% | 55.9% | 47.7% | 0.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensationβ
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:34 | 23:57 | 15:16–34:50 | |
| Points | 8.4 | 7.6 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 44.8% | 46.2% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Season and date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · 2016-03-04 | VMI | W 92–85 | 19:41 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-02-20 | VMI | W 73–67 | 19:10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 108.3% |
| 2016 · 2016-02-18 | UNC Greensboro | L 77–82 | 26:11 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-10 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 20.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-02-13 | W Carolina | L 71–76 | 34:50 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-8 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 37.5% |
| 2016 · 2016-02-08 | Citadel | W 95–86 | 27:57 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 58.3% |
| 2016 · 2016-02-04 | Furman | L 65–67 | 19:51 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-01-21 | VMI | L 76–83 | 17:19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-01-16 | W Carolina | W 84–68 | 20:00 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-01-11 | Furman | L 57–77 | 26:37 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2016 · 2016-01-05 | Citadel | W 94–74 | 26:03 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 38.9% |
| 2016 · 2015-12-20 | Nebraska | W 69–58 | 19:14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 150.0% |
| 2016 · 2015-12-18 | South Alabama | L 70–72 | 15:16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2016 · 2015-12-04 | Texas | L 49–59 | 32:50 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 16.7% |
| 2016 · 2015-12-01 | Jacksonville St | W 77–71 | 28:32 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 43.8% |
| 2016 · 2015-11-28 | Austin Peay | L 73–74 | 34:09 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-12 | 5-7 | 3-3 | 87.5% |
| 2016 · 2015-11-25 | Idaho | W 75–58 | 25:14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 0.0% |
| 2016 · 2015-11-24 | North Texas | W 74–72 | 18:29 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2016 · 2015-11-21 | Kennesaw | W 77–65 | 26:43 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2016 · 2015-11-13 | Louisville | L 45–86 | 16:49 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-7 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 14.3% |
Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.