J.J. Panoske
WI Milwaukee · 18 available appearances · 2013–2013 · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
345:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 18
- Minutes per game
- 19:11
- Points per game
- 5.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.1 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.5 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 91 | 64 | 13 | 6 | 29 | 31 | 30 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 32–83 | 38.6%† | 4.6 | 9.6 |
| 2P | 23–44 | 52.3%† | 2.4 | 5.1 |
| 3P | 9–39 | 23.1%† | 2.2 | 4.5 |
| FT | 18–23 | 78.3%† | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.0%† | 48.9%† | 47.0%† | 27.7%† | 0.42 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensationβ
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:57 | 19:11 | 0:58–34:18 | |
| Points | 6.2 | 5.1 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.3% | 37.6% | 0.0%–83.3% |
| Season and date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 · 2013-03-05 | WI Green Bay | L 46–62 | 21:48 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-26 | WI Green Bay | L 61–78 | 20:21 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-20 | IL Chicago | W 64–53 | 14:29 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-15 | Youngstown St | L 80–94 | 22:11 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 83.3% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-12 | Loyola-Chicago | W 71–53 | 25:56 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 33.3% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-09 | Wright St | L 49–64 | 21:04 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2013 · 2013-02-01 | Valparaiso | L 40–71 | 19:14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-30 | Loyola-Chicago | L 65–76 | 10:46 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-25 | WI Green Bay | L 54–74 | 31:14 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 58.3% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-23 | IL Chicago | L 50–60 | 26:28 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-19 | Youngstown St | L 72–75 | 30:15 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 39.3% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-12 | Valparaiso | L 52–76 | 23:38 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 40.0% |
| 2013 · 2013-01-05 | Wright St | L 51–53 | 34:18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2013 · 2012-12-22 | Wisconsin | L 53–74 | 26:02 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 81.3% |
| 2013 · 2012-12-12 | Fairfield | L 46–62 | 2:42 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2013 · 2012-12-09 | DePaul | L 50–84 | 11:05 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2013 · 2012-12-01 | Northern Iowa | L 61–72 | 2:57 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2013 · 2012-11-11 | South Carolina | L 75–82 | 0:58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.