Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Isiah Williams

Utah Valley · 23 available appearances · 2012–2012 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

723:56 minutes logged

Games logged
23
Minutes per game
31:29
Points per game
16.1
Rebounds / assists per game
2.7 / 2.4
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game16.12.72.40.80.12.51.3
Per 40 minutes20.53.43.11.00.23.21.7
Season totals37161561935831
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG124–33836.7%14.718.7
2P64–15940.3%6.98.8
3P60–17933.5%7.89.9
FT63–7682.9%3.34.2
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
45.6%49.9%53.0%22.5%0.97

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2012 · 2012-03-13Weber StL 69–7237:512671113210-195-111-165.8%
2012 · 2012-03-09NJITL 78–8842:44261401147-263-149-1032.7%
2012 · 2012-03-03North DakotaL 56–5739:0383111322-150-54-413.3%
2012 · 2012-02-25UTRGVW 74–6438:22284200246-143-613-1553.6%
2012 · 2012-02-23Houston ChrW 75–5636:52151210115-131-44-442.3%
2012 · 2012-02-11Chicago StW 66–610:00151130315-183-112-236.1%
2012 · 2012-02-04Houston ChrW 68–6634:11163310016-153-81-150.0%
2012 · 2012-01-21North DakotaW 72–6431:47125200124-102-42-450.0%
2012 · 2012-01-13SeattleW 84–7440:00193510408-203-100-047.5%
2012 · 2012-01-07SeattleW 77–7236:52221220107-175-113-455.9%
2012 · 2012-01-03WyomingL 70–7637:29232100208-165-72-265.6%
2012 · 2011-12-30ChattanoogaL 59–7423:4861800102-112-100-027.3%
2012 · 2011-12-29HamptonW 42–4031:41122200104-153-91-236.7%
2012 · 2011-12-22MontanaL 52–6532:1483030513-82-60-150.0%
2012 · 2011-12-19MaineL 60–7731:23111100303-92-43-444.4%
2012 · 2011-12-17Georgia StL 68–7137:43124500824-153-111-436.7%
2012 · 2011-12-10Portland StW 93–8738:16203300519-161-61-159.4%
2012 · 2011-12-06Utah StL 54–6333:43162320415-154-62-246.7%
2012 · 2011-11-30WyomingL 41–7425:1921000000-40-32-20.0%
2012 · 2011-11-25OaklandL 83–8919:413533305311-215-118-864.3%
2012 · 2011-11-22ArkansasL 59–6724:1434000321-81-60-018.8%
2012 · 2011-11-19Missouri KCW 58–5422:28174300136-133-102-357.7%
2012 · 2011-11-14HoustonL 71–8428:15192410118-201-62-242.5%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.