Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Chris De La Rosa

UMBC · 21 available appearances · 2011–2011 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

751:38 minutes logged

Games logged
21
Minutes per game
35:48
Points per game
15.6
Rebounds / assists per game
4.0 / 6.1
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game15.64.06.11.00.02.92.3
Per 40 minutes17.54.46.81.10.03.22.6
Season totals328831282006049
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG121–29940.5%14.215.9
2P99–21945.2%10.411.7
3P22–8027.5%3.84.3
FT64–9071.1%4.34.8
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
44.1%48.4%26.8%30.1%2.13

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2011 · 2011-03-03BinghamtonL 65–9132:3531810321-100-31-210.0%
2011 · 2011-02-19HartfordL 57–6420:2322100421-70-50-014.3%
2011 · 2011-02-12New HampshireL 46–6315:5331100321-61-30-025.0%
2011 · 2011-02-09VermontL 67–8037:22203610228-180-44-544.4%
2011 · 2011-02-06MaineW 84–7938:052461310216-161-111-1640.6%
2011 · 2011-02-03BinghamtonW 83–7936:09106810155-130-10-238.5%
2011 · 2011-01-31Stony BrookL 59–6937:21123520233-140-56-721.4%
2011 · 2011-01-23New HampshireL 60–8038:41235730319-193-72-255.3%
2011 · 2011-01-20HartfordW 74–7047:3257800411-130-23-47.7%
2011 · 2011-01-15VermontL 48–8538:28201220407-152-54-453.3%
2011 · 2011-01-12BinghamtonL 75–8339:513155108312-204-73-470.0%
2011 · 2011-01-08MaineL 67–8239:13244810139-151-35-663.3%
2011 · 2011-01-02Stony BrookL 56–6440:00166820326-152-72-546.7%
2011 · 2010-12-30NiagaraW 68–6739:22214410329-163-50-065.6%
2011 · 2010-12-22Notre DameL 53–9337:28155320227-141-30-053.6%
2011 · 2010-12-18Morgan StL 62–7538:162051100247-140-36-850.0%
2011 · 2010-12-14American UnivL 53–6638:10180500236-142-54-550.0%
2011 · 2010-11-27DuquesneL 69–10132:32141500325-120-14-441.7%
2011 · 2010-11-20Central ConnL 74–8239:0030116004210-242-38-1145.8%
2011 · 2010-11-17Loyola MDL 72–8332:33103520145-140-40-335.7%
2011 · 2010-11-14VMIL 77–9432:4474900333-100-31-230.0%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.