Steve Frankoski
Columbia · 19 available appearances · 2011–2011 · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
389:06 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 19
- Minutes per game
- 20:29
- Points per game
- 5.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.6 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 113 | 27 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 17 | 27 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 38–125 | 30.4% | 6.6 | 12.9 |
| 2P | 11–36 | 30.6%† | 1.9 | 3.7 |
| 3P | 27–89 | 30.3% | 4.7 | 9.1 |
| FT | 10–11 | 90.9%† | 0.6 | 1.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.2% | 43.5% | 71.2% | 8.8% | 0.65 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensationβ
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 16:27 | 20:29 | 0:00–34:28 | |
| Points | 1.4 | 5.9 | 0.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 14.7% | 33.6% | 0.0%–87.5% |
| Season and date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 · 2011-03-04 | Yale | L 81–87 | 13:41 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2011 · 2011-02-26 | Princeton | L 61–66 | 19:07 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2011 · 2011-02-19 | Harvard | L 42–61 | 14:43 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2011 · 2011-02-18 | Dartmouth | W 67–60 | 16:52 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-10 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 10.0% |
| 2011 · 2011-02-11 | Princeton | L 46–76 | 17:54 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2011 · 2011-02-05 | Yale | L 67–72 | 12:01 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2011 · 2011-01-29 | Dartmouth | W 66–45 | 34:28 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 72.2% |
| 2011 · 2011-01-28 | Harvard | L 66–77 | 19:18 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2011 · 2011-01-05 | Lafayette | W 76–73 | 16:15 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2011 · 2011-01-02 | Elon | L 69–70 | 14:31 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2011 · 2010-12-30 | Maine | W 74–71 | 21:33 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 30.0% |
| 2011 · 2010-12-11 | Bryant | W 76–72 | 22:27 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 3-10 | 2-2 | 45.0% |
| 2011 · 2010-12-04 | Stony Brook | W 73–72 | 29:34 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2011 · 2010-12-01 | Bucknell | L 68–73 | 25:27 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-11 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2011 · 2010-11-28 | American Univ | W 64–62 | 0:00 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2011 · 2010-11-23 | Colgate | W 76–63 | 23:02 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2011 · 2010-11-20 | Longwood | L 76–95 | 26:23 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2011 · 2010-11-17 | St John's | L 66–79 | 31:32 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 42.9% |
| 2011 · 2010-11-12 | La Salle | L 71–82 | 30:18 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.