Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Nate Hutcheson

W Michigan · 23 available appearances · 2011–2011 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

560:43 minutes logged

Games logged
23
Minutes per game
24:23
Points per game
7.0
Rebounds / assists per game
5.2 / 0.6
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game7.05.20.60.30.61.52.6
Per 40 minutes11.58.51.00.41.02.44.3
Season totals161119146143460
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG55–13939.6%6.09.9
2P35–7646.1%†3.35.4
3P20–6331.7%2.74.5
FT31–4766.0%2.03.4
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
46.8%50.4%45.3%33.8%0.41

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2011 · 2011-03-16Tennessee TechW 74–6629:10115002135-81-20-068.8%
2011 · 2011-03-11AkronL 68–7924:43612000133-60-20-150.0%
2011 · 2011-03-10Bowling GreenW 67–5629:4474010022-91-52-227.8%
2011 · 2011-03-05C MichiganW 81–6827:30123001443-32-24-4133.3%
2011 · 2011-03-02Ball StW 87–7023:37115100104-72-41-371.4%
2011 · 2011-02-23ToledoW 68–569:2433010351-31-20-050.0%
2011 · 2011-02-19Illinois StW 68–6524:2265200022-51-31-250.0%
2011 · 2011-02-09AkronL 71–8321:4446110041-50-32-220.0%
2011 · 2011-02-05Bowling GreenW 75–6118:3554300232-41-30-062.5%
2011 · 2011-01-25BuffaloL 68–7920:1012000340-40-21-40.0%
2011 · 2011-01-19ToledoL 60–7329:5869000252-71-41-635.7%
2011 · 2011-01-12Ball StL 63–7227:0422100341-60-40-016.7%
2011 · 2011-01-09C MichiganW 63–5626:20109000144-90-12-344.4%
2011 · 2010-12-31E IllinoisW 69–6022:5823000200-50-22-20.0%
2011 · 2010-12-22Utah StL 57–7826:48126001024-82-22-262.5%
2011 · 2010-12-21TroyL 99–10230:5398303112-61-24-641.7%
2011 · 2010-12-18S Dakota StW 77–7415:0805000240-00-00-0—
2011 · 2010-12-11Georgia StW 61–5924:0304001000-30-20-00.0%
2011 · 2010-12-08DetroitW 71–6926:28146122536-102-50-070.0%
2011 · 2010-11-27IllinoisL 63–7825:02155001305-83-52-381.3%
2011 · 2010-11-23WI MilwaukeeW 67–5525:3522101051-40-10-025.0%
2011 · 2010-11-20Loyola-ChicagoL 64–8227:36128101004-100-24-440.0%
2011 · 2010-11-12XavierL 65–6823:51113011023-92-53-344.4%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.