Kevin-David Rice
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
416:47 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 12:15
- Points per game
- 3.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.8 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 113 | 48 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 22 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 32–79 | 40.5%† | 2.3 | 7.6 |
| 2P | 14–28 | 50.0%† | 0.8 | 2.7 |
| 3P | 18–51 | 35.3% | 1.5 | 4.9 |
| FT | 31–32 | 96.9% | 0.9 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.9%† | 60.7%† | 64.6%† | 40.5%† | 0.73 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Kevin-David Rice | E Michigan | 14 | 8:02 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 12.8 | 31.6%† | 100.0%† | 54.9%† |
| 2023 Kevin-David Rice | E Michigan | 17 | 15:46 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 10.7 | 37.9%† | 96.4% | 63.9%† |
| 2024 Kevin-David Rice | E Michigan | 3Few games | 12:08 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 5.5 | 33.3%† | — | 62.5%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | -0.2 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 938 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.6 | -2.2 to -0.9 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | -1.2 | Not computed for this season | 381 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology