David Acosta
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
385:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 39
- Minutes per game
- 9:53
- Points per game
- 2.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.1 | 9.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 8.6 |
| Season totals | 107 | 89 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 18 | 83 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 45–67 | 67.2%† | 1.7 | 7.0 |
| 2P | 45–67 | 67.2%† | 1.7 | 7.0 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 17–39 | 43.6% | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.2%† | 63.6%† | 0.0%† | 58.2%† | 0.67 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 David Acosta | Tennessee St | 9Few games | 5:57 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 6.0 | — | 66.7%† | 60.2%† |
| 2023 David Acosta | Tennessee St | 21 | 10:32 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 14.5 | — | 38.7% | 67.1%† |
| 2024 David Acosta | Tennessee St | 9Few games | 12:18 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 6.9 | — | 50.0%† | 53.1%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Tennessee St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.5 to +0.1 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | -0.2 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 384 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Tennessee St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.1 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.2 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 775 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology