John McGriff
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1111:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 61
- Minutes per game
- 18:14
- Points per game
- 5.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.9 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.9 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 358 | 131 | 100 | 27 | 1 | 82 | 97 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 148–401 | 36.9% | 6.6 | 14.4 |
| 2P | 116–300 | 38.7% | 4.9 | 10.8 |
| 3P | 32–101 | 31.7% | 1.7 | 3.6 |
| FT | 30–51 | 58.8% | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.9% | 42.3% | 25.2% | 12.7% | 1.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 John McGriff | St John's | 16Under 100 minutes | 4:47 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 4.7 | 28.6%† | 50.0%† | 32.4%† |
| 2022 John McGriff | Binghamton | 20 | 29:18 | 11.8 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 16.1 | 34.0%† | 66.7% | 44.8% |
| 2023 John McGriff | Binghamton | 17 | 18:48 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 11.3 | 32.3%† | 61.5%† | 39.9% |
| 2024 John McGriff | E Michigan | 8Few games | 16:13 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 7.1 | 25.0%† | 16.7%† | 34.2%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.2 to -0.9 | Limited evidence | -1.2 | -0.2 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 450 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.8 | -2.9 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -0.9 | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.1 | 1,081 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.4 | Not computed for this season | 2,030 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology