Ethan Anderson
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2015:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 87
- Minutes per game
- 23:10
- Points per game
- 5.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.9 / 2.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.6 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.6 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 484 | 248 | 253 | 49 | 20 | 144 | 164 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 186–449 | 41.4% | 5.2 | 8.9 |
| 2P | 149–339 | 44.0% | 3.9 | 6.7 |
| 3P | 37–110 | 33.6% | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| FT | 75–147 | 51.0% | 1.7 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.5% | 47.1% | 24.5% | 32.7% | 1.76 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Ethan Anderson | USC | 21 | 25:52 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 8.8 | 47.4%† | 56.1% | 48.0% |
| 2021 Ethan Anderson | USC | 15 | 21:40 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 9.4 | 33.3%† | 63.3% | 42.1%† |
| 2022 Ethan Anderson | USC | 33 | 20:58 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 8.4 | 29.4% | 36.4%† | 43.5% |
| 2023 Ethan Anderson | Wyoming | 18 | 25:18 | 7.9 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 12.6 | 30.8%† | 46.3% | 54.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Wyoming | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.6 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.6 | +1.7range +1.3 to +2.1 | 1,493 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.0 | -1.1 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.1 | Not computed for this season | 2,278 | ||
| 2021 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.9 | -0.2 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +0.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,108 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.0 | -0.3 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.9 | Not computed for this season | 1,811 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology