Joe Kasperzyk
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1373:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 68
- Minutes per game
- 20:12
- Points per game
- 8.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.9 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.2 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 590 | 129 | 114 | 69 | 9 | 144 | 140 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 189–454 | 41.6% | 6.7 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 138–285 | 48.4% | 4.2 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 51–169 | 30.2% | 2.5 | 4.9 |
| FT | 161–200 | 80.5% | 2.9 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.2% | 54.4% | 37.2% | 44.1% | 0.79 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Joe Kasperzyk | Bryant | 19 | 24:55 | 10.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 17.0 | 21.6%† | 79.7% | 55.0% |
| 2021 Joe Kasperzyk | SE Louisiana | 3Few games | 21:42 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 13.5 | 40.0%† | 40.0%† | 45.5%† |
| 2022 Joe Kasperzyk | SE Louisiana | 20 | 20:44 | 11.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 22.0 | 34.4% | 82.2% | 59.3% |
| 2023 Joe Kasperzyk | Niagara | 26 | 16:11 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 13.2 | 29.3% | 83.7% | 48.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.8 | -2.9 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -1.3 | +1.2range +0.8 to +1.6 | 1,335 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | SE Louisiana | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.4 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,461 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2019 | Bryant | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.7 | -3.4 to -0.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -2.3 | Not computed for this season | 1,510 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology