Tyger Campbell
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3698:27 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 116
- Minutes per game
- 31:53
- Points per game
- 11.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 4.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.0 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.8 | 2.9 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 1273 | 267 | 571 | 122 | 5 | 183 | 198 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 453–1121 | 40.4% | 9.7 | 12.1 |
| 2P | 325–746 | 43.6% | 6.4 | 8.1 |
| 3P | 128–375 | 34.1% | 3.2 | 4.1 |
| FT | 239–303 | 78.9% | 2.6 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.1% | 50.7% | 33.5% | 27.0% | 3.12 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Tyger Campbell | UCLA | 24 | 29:19 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 10.7 | 26.4% | 66.7% | 44.6% |
| 2021 Tyger Campbell | UCLA | 27 | 33:14 | 9.9 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 11.9 | 23.4%† | 74.6% | 50.3% |
| 2022 Tyger Campbell | UCLA | 32 | 32:16 | 11.9 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 14.8 | 41.0% | 83.1% | 56.5% |
| 2023 Tyger Campbell | UCLA | 33 | 32:16 | 13.2 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 16.3 | 35.8% | 85.3% | 49.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +5.0 | +3.9 to +6.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | +2.5 | +6.3range +5.4 to +7.1 | 3,576 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +5.1 | +3.9 to +6.3 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | +2.0 | Not computed for this season | 3,490 | ||
| 2021 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.9 | +0.8 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.5 | Not computed for this season | 2,972 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.0 | -1.2 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 2,261 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology