Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Kamaka Hepa

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

1401:53 minutes logged

Games logged
74
Minutes per game
18:57
Points per game
5.7
Rebounds / assists per game
3.3 / 0.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game5.73.30.80.30.50.91.4
Per 40 minutes12.07.01.60.51.01.93.1
Season totals42124557193467107
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG139–33341.7%4.59.5
2P60–12448.4%1.73.5
3P79–20937.8%2.86.0
FT64–7585.3%1.02.1
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
53.6%57.5%62.8%22.5%0.85

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2019 Kamaka HepaTexas 208:180.91.40.44.620.8%†100.0%†32.9%†
2020 Kamaka HepaTexas 1913:333.01.90.58.932.5%†66.7%†52.8%†
2021 Kamaka HepaTexas 6Few games8:454.31.30.219.853.3%†0.0%†74.5%†
2022 Kamaka HepaHawaii 1330:1510.55.51.213.941.2%85.7%61.5%†
2023 Kamaka HepaHawaii 1633:1811.46.31.413.740.5%92.9%59.0%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2023HawaiiNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+2.7+1.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+0.5+2.2+5.5range +4.7 to +6.51,759Season detail
2022HawaiiNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+0.6-0.3 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+0.2+0.4Not computed for this season1,213
2021Not applicableNone: no budget that season—development: in model selectionNo model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.Not applicable
2020TexasNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+0.2-0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence-0.1+0.3Not computed for this season852
2019TexasNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection-0.3-1.2 to +0.5Limited evidence-0.2-0.1Not computed for this season435Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology