Uros Plavsic
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
952:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 84
- Minutes per game
- 11:20
- Points per game
- 3.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.5 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.4 | 9.8 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 5.8 |
| Season totals | 296 | 234 | 39 | 30 | 16 | 54 | 137 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 120–221 | 54.3% | 2.6 | 9.3 |
| 2P | 120–220 | 54.5% | 2.6 | 9.2 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 56–113 | 49.6% | 1.3 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.3% | 54.7% | 0.5% | 51.1% | 0.72 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Uros Plavsic | Tennessee | 16 | 7:35 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 13.8 | — | 66.7%† | 47.1%† |
| 2021 Uros Plavsic | Tennessee | 12Under 100 minutes | 4:19 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 10.0 | — | 37.5%† | 48.1%† |
| 2022 Uros Plavsic | Tennessee | 29 | 14:13 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 0.4 | 12.1 | 0.0%† | 60.0% | 58.5%† |
| 2023 Uros Plavsic | Tennessee | 27 | 13:35 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 12.7 | — | 35.6% | 54.8%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Tennessee | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.0 | +1.9 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +3.1 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.2 | 1,241 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Tennessee | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.8 | +0.6 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.9 | Not computed for this season | 1,444 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2020 | Tennessee | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -2.8 | -3.5 to -2.0 | Limited evidence | -1.0 | -1.7 | Not computed for this season | 400 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology