Jake Forrester
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
866:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 59
- Minutes per game
- 14:41
- Points per game
- 6.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.2 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.8 | 9.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 6.1 |
| Season totals | 364 | 214 | 25 | 9 | 28 | 72 | 132 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 143–261 | 54.8% | 4.4 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 142–260 | 54.6% | 4.4 | 12.0 |
| 3P | 1–1 | 100.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 77–133 | 57.9% | 2.3 | 6.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.0% | 57.0% | 0.4% | 51.0% | 0.35 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Jake Forrester | Indiana | 9Few games | 3:52 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 26.4 | — | 37.5%† | 65.6%† |
| 2020 Jake Forrester | Temple | 22 | 17:37 | 7.5 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 16.9 | — | 50.8% | 52.3% |
| 2021 Jake Forrester | Temple | 3Few games | 23:22 | 10.3 | 7.0 | 0.3 | 17.7 | — | 58.3%† | 66.6%† |
| 2023 Jake Forrester | St Louis | 25 | 14:58 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 15.6 | 100.0%† | 70.0% | 59.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | St Louis | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.5 | +1.8range +1.4 to +2.2 | 1,306 | Season detail | |
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2020 | Temple | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,307 | ||
| 2019 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology