Trey Jemison
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2629:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 132
- Minutes per game
- 19:55
- Points per game
- 5.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.6 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.2 | 11.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 5.1 |
| Season totals | 737 | 769 | 69 | 54 | 165 | 133 | 332 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 300–539 | 55.7% | 4.1 | 8.2 |
| 2P | 300–538 | 55.8% | 4.1 | 8.2 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 137–216 | 63.4% | 1.6 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.7% | 58.1% | 0.2% | 40.1% | 0.52 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Trey Jemison | Clemson | 16Under 100 minutes | 4:34 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.7 | — | 33.3%† | 34.2%† |
| 2020 Trey Jemison | Clemson | 25 | 8:17 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 6.6 | 0.0%† | 40.0%† | 43.1%† |
| 2021 Trey Jemison | UAB | 24 | 27:12 | 7.1 | 7.4 | 1.1 | 10.5 | — | 67.3% | 53.3% |
| 2022 Trey Jemison | UAB | 31 | 25:11 | 6.7 | 7.4 | 0.7 | 10.7 | — | 64.2% | 64.5% |
| 2023 Trey Jemison | UAB | 36 | 25:27 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 0.5 | 13.9 | — | 64.4% | 60.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | UAB | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.4 | +2.2 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +2.7 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.5 | 2,783 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | UAB | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +4.8 | +3.5 to +6.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +4.1 | Not computed for this season | 2,679 | ||
| 2021 | UAB | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.7 | +1.6 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +2.9 | Not computed for this season | 2,104 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Clemson | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.9 | -2.6 to -1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -2.2 | +0.3 | Not computed for this season | 654 | ||
| 2019 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology