Zep Jasper
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2134:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 92
- Minutes per game
- 23:12
- Points per game
- 5.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.0 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 479 | 141 | 122 | 61 | 6 | 67 | 166 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 162–429 | 37.8% | 4.7 | 8.0 |
| 2P | 84–197 | 42.6% | 2.1 | 3.7 |
| 3P | 78–232 | 33.6% | 2.5 | 4.3 |
| FT | 77–97 | 79.4% | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.9% | 50.8% | 54.1% | 22.6% | 1.82 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Zep Jasper | Col Charleston | 22 | 24:43 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 8.5 | 42.1% | 81.0%† | 60.4%† |
| 2020 Zep Jasper | Col Charleston | 6Few games | 27:59 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 9.1 | 33.3%† | 85.7%† | 46.3%† |
| 2021 Zep Jasper | Col Charleston | 8Few games | 34:39 | 12.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 14.9 | 23.3%† | 78.9%† | 45.4% |
| 2022 Zep Jasper | Auburn | 29 | 22:57 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 9.4 | 38.5% | 82.5% | 53.6% |
| 2023 Zep Jasper | Auburn | 27 | 17:46 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 5.6 | 26.5%† | 60.0%† | 43.8%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Auburn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.1 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | +2.6 | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.1 | 1,715 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Auburn | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.7 | +0.2 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +1.9 | Not computed for this season | 2,294 | ||
| 2021 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.2 | -1.8 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -0.9 | Not computed for this season | 900 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.4 | -0.9 to +0.2 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | -0.0 | Not computed for this season | 554 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
| 2019 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.1 | -0.8 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -1.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,654 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology