Rylan Bergersen
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2513:51 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 97
- Minutes per game
- 25:55
- Points per game
- 11.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 2.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.6 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.9 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 1126 | 331 | 271 | 78 | 37 | 182 | 200 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 366–832 | 44.0% | 8.6 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 274–522 | 52.5% | 5.4 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 92–310 | 29.7% | 3.2 | 4.9 |
| FT | 302–430 | 70.2% | 4.4 | 6.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5% | 55.1% | 37.3% | 51.7% | 1.49 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Rylan Bergersen | BYU | 20Under 100 minutes | 4:33 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 42.9%† | 75.0%† | 67.6%† |
| 2019 Rylan Bergersen | BYU | 8Few games | 6:22 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 42.9%† | 0.0%† | 55.1%† |
| 2020 Rylan Bergersen | Cent Arkansas | 25 | 33:44 | 16.4 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 19.4 | 28.5% | 69.3% | 54.0% |
| 2021 Rylan Bergersen | Cent Arkansas | 19 | 34:58 | 17.3 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 19.8 | 33.3% | 68.3% | 54.1% |
| 2022 Rylan Bergersen | E Washington | 25 | 34:34 | 13.9 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 16.1 | 24.7% | 73.0% | 56.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | E Washington | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.1 | -0.9 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.1 | Not computed for this season | 2,997 | ||
| 2021 | Cent Arkansas | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.1 | -1.0 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.9 | Not computed for this season | 2,507 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Cent Arkansas | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.1 | -1.6 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.3 | Not computed for this season | 3,202 | ||
| 2019 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2018 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology