Tai Bibbs
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1237:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 56
- Minutes per game
- 22:06
- Points per game
- 5.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.7 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.9 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.6 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 328 | 149 | 47 | 34 | 10 | 40 | 91 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 107–285 | 37.5% | 5.1 | 9.2 |
| 2P | 66–149 | 44.3% | 2.7 | 4.8 |
| 3P | 41–136 | 30.1% | 2.4 | 4.4 |
| FT | 73–108 | 67.6% | 1.9 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.7% | 49.3% | 47.7% | 37.9% | 1.18 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Tai Bibbs | Columbia | 10 | 11:41 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 12.3 | 35.3%† | 66.7%† | 51.0%† |
| 2019 Tai Bibbs | Columbia | 10 | 13:42 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 9.3 | 27.3%† | 53.8%† | 44.8%† |
| 2020 Tai Bibbs | Columbia | 21 | 26:38 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 8.6 | 25.4% | 60.5% | 43.8% |
| 2022 Tai Bibbs | Howard | 15 | 28:18 | 9.3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 13.2 | 35.6%† | 80.0% | 56.2% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.9 | -2.2 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,538 | ||
| 2020 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.7 | -1.5 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.7 | +1.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,732 | ||
| 2019 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.1 | -0.9 to +1.2 | Limited evidence | -0.6 | +0.7 | Not computed for this season | 475 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
| 2018 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.1 | -0.5 to +0.7 | Limited evidence | +0.5 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 388 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology