Jarvis Doles
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1114:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 76
- Minutes per game
- 14:40
- Points per game
- 5.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.7 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.1 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.9 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 387 | 208 | 42 | 24 | 19 | 43 | 122 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 140–328 | 42.7% | 4.3 | 11.8 |
| 2P | 95–190 | 50.0% | 2.5 | 6.8 |
| 3P | 45–138 | 32.6% | 1.8 | 5.0 |
| FT | 62–87 | 71.3% | 1.1 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5% | 52.8% | 42.1% | 26.5% | 0.98 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Jarvis Doles | Drexel | 17 | 13:02 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 7.6 | 33.3%† | 66.7%† | 55.3%† |
| 2019 Jarvis Doles | Drexel | 26 | 9:38 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 16.5 | 42.9%† | 81.5% | 59.3%† |
| 2020 Jarvis Doles | Drexel | 5Few games | 9:27 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 8.5 | 25.0%† | 33.3%† | 30.6%† |
| 2023 Jarvis Doles | UMBC | 28 | 21:16 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 15.6 | 24.5% | 68.8% | 51.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | UMBC | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.8 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.7 | +2.2range +1.6 to +2.8 | 2,055 | Season detail | |
| 2020 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2019 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.9 | -0.1 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 836 | ||
| 2018 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.7 | -0.0 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.8 | Not computed for this season | 765 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology