Eric Williams Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3332:51 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 109
- Minutes per game
- 30:35
- Points per game
- 11.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.9 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.9 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.5 | 9.1 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 1294 | 756 | 166 | 113 | 31 | 180 | 242 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 454–1098 | 41.3% | 10.1 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 289–641 | 45.1% | 5.9 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 165–457 | 36.1% | 4.2 | 5.5 |
| FT | 221–304 | 72.7% | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.9% | 52.5% | 41.6% | 27.7% | 0.92 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Eric Williams Jr. | Duquesne | 24 | 34:30 | 14.5 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 16.8 | 37.1% | 75.3% | 54.1% |
| 2019 Eric Williams Jr. | Duquesne | 20 | 29:16 | 14.2 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 19.4 | 38.6% | 70.4% | 56.7% |
| 2021 Eric Williams Jr. | Oregon | 22 | 30:29 | 10.6 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 14.0 | 36.6% | 75.4% | 53.7% |
| 2022 Eric Williams Jr. | Oregon | 30 | 27:05 | 8.2 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 12.2 | 33.0% | 69.8% | 46.3% |
| 2023 Eric Williams Jr. | San Diego | 13 | 33:34 | 14.0 | 9.6 | 1.8 | 16.7 | 34.1%† | 70.8% | 51.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | San Diego | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -2.0 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -1.5 | +2.1range +1.5 to +2.6 | 1,542 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.4 | -0.2 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.2 | Not computed for this season | 2,596 | ||
| 2021 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.4 | +1.2 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.0 | Not computed for this season | 2,333 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2019 | Duquesne | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.0 | -2.0 to -0.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.8 | Not computed for this season | 2,064 | ||
| 2018 | Duquesne | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.3 | -0.6 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.2 | Not computed for this season | 2,774 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology