Justin Minaya
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2615:31 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 86
- Minutes per game
- 30:25
- Points per game
- 7.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.5 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.0 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.3 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 606 | 471 | 150 | 58 | 62 | 94 | 187 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 221–538 | 41.1% | 6.3 | 8.2 |
| 2P | 136–253 | 53.8% | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| 3P | 85–285 | 29.8% | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| FT | 79–126 | 62.7% | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.0% | 51.1% | 53.0% | 23.4% | 1.60 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Justin Minaya | South Carolina | 17 | 26:50 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 11.6 | 36.4% | 75.0%† | 52.8% |
| 2019 Justin Minaya | South Carolina | 3Few games | 25:20 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 14.3%† | 50.0%† | 45.3%† |
| 2020 Justin Minaya | South Carolina | 16 | 29:41 | 8.0 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 10.8 | 28.3% | 67.6% | 55.5%† |
| 2021 Justin Minaya | South Carolina | 18 | 30:14 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 24.2% | 61.5% | 45.4% |
| 2022 Justin Minaya | Providence | 32 | 33:16 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 31.7% | 55.8% | 51.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Providence | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.2 | +1.1 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +1.8 | Not computed for this season | 3,586 | ||
| 2021 | South Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +0.6 | Not computed for this season | 2,091 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | South Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.0 | +0.6 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +1.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,696 | ||
| 2019 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2018 | South Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -0.8 | -1.7 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,580 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology