James Towns
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1728:06 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 77
- Minutes per game
- 22:27
- Points per game
- 10.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.1 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.0 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Season totals | 779 | 200 | 165 | 56 | 0 | 129 | 87 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 261–595 | 43.9% | 7.7 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 213–450 | 47.3% | 5.8 | 10.4 |
| 3P | 48–145 | 33.1% | 1.9 | 3.4 |
| FT | 209–266 | 78.6% | 3.5 | 6.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.9% | 54.7% | 24.4% | 44.7% | 1.28 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 James Towns | Niagara | 4Few games | 17:46 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 12.9 | 37.5%† | 85.7%† | 47.8%† |
| 2018 James Towns | Niagara | 27 | 17:15 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 21.2 | 38.5% | 78.9% | 61.6% |
| 2019 James Towns | Niagara | 19 | 28:44 | 10.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 14.3 | 32.6%† | 77.9% | 50.5% |
| 2020 James Towns | Niagara | 27 | 23:53 | 11.6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 19.5 | 26.2%† | 78.2% | 53.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.8 | -2.9 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -2.2 | Not computed for this season | 2,134 | ||
| 2019 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.3 | -2.3 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -2.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,854 | ||
| 2018 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -1.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,607 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology